Matic Hribar vs Ioan Alexandru Teglas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Why does second serve performance matter? Matic Hribar has a higher second serve points win rate (44.03%) compared to Ioan Alexandru Teglas (35.86%), suggesting better reliability in service games.
• When evaluating return games, Matic Hribar claims a marginally superior ability, winning more points on opponents' weak second serves (46.90%) compared to Teglas's (45.45%). Could this impact the match outcome?
• Looking at first serve returns, Matic Hribar’s effectiveness is further highlighted, winning 27.32% compared to Teglas's 23.16%. This suggests an edge in breaking serve.
• Who handles pressure better? Hribar excels slightly with a 42.86% break point saving rate, compared to Teglas's 40.23%.
• In terms of matches won over the past year, Hribar again leads with a 45.45% win rate (W/L 5/6), compared to Teglas's 36.67% (W/L 11/19).
• Surface preference is key. Teglas thrives on clay with a 34% career win rate, while Hribar performs best on hard courts with a 34% win rate. This match factor heavily into predictive analysis.
• In the same tournament level (Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K), Hribar’s win rate is higher at 45.45% compared to Teglas's 36.67%.
• What about opponent strength? Ioan Alexandru Teglas has faced slightly tougher competition on average, with opponents ranked 53.7 compared to Hribar’s 66.82.
• Deciding sets illustrate Hribar's composure under pressure, winning 67% of them, well above Teglas's 40% over the past year.
• Current event stats could reveal more about their present form, but historical data suggests consistent patterns.
• On breakpoint conversions, Teglas has been more successful, converting 41.94% of break opportunities, indicating a critical advantage over Hribar’s 25% rate.

Editorial Prediction (November 24, 2025, UTC):

The head-to-head stats offer intriguing insights into what might unfold in the upcoming match between Ioan Alexandru Teglas and Matic Hribar. Each player shows distinct strengths and weaknesses, highlighting areas to watch.

Matic Hribar's robust second serve performance, coupled with better return game stats, indicates a potential upper hand in the service and return dynamics. His adeptness at saving breakpoints further strengthens his claim as a tough opponent to crack under pressure.

Ioan Alexandru Teglas, while less successful in recent win-loss ratios, proposes threats with superior break point conversion rates. This suggests an ability to seize critical moments, which could tip the scales his way.

Considering the collective data, Matic Hribar, with overall stronger recent performances in key areas like second serve and deciding set resilience, emerges as the likely winner for this match. However, watch out for Tenglas's conversion rate on breakpoints, as it could pivot the match in unexpected ways.